Dani Weidner Open to Staff roles

Customers / Program design and research ops

Founding a customer advisory program

The team needed a trusted line to power users, and none existed. I founded a customer advisory community in EMEA, sequenced its expansion to two more regions, and ran the research practice off it.

In one minute

SituationFeedback was ad hoc, and the most valuable customers, often the most at risk, had no relationship with the people building the product.
What I didDesigned the program, hand-selected the founding cohort, built a scoring model for expansion, and wired the cohort into the product process as a standing research pool.
Outcome7 of 8 founding accounts are still in the program a year in, and one renewed citing the program as a big reason.
Result7 of 8Founding accounts still in the program a year in; the only loss was a layoff
Result2Founding accounts renewed, one citing the program as a big reason
Result8Roadmap items validated or influenced by the cohort, 3 since shipped

Decisions

Decision 01 / 04

Weight membership toward power users and at-risk accounts

I hand-selected a founding cohort across travel, food, fintech, retail, and tech, and designed a year-long cadence: an in-person kickoff, monthly virtual sessions, quarterly events, and a dedicated channel. Within 48 hours, 85.7% of founding members had joined the channel.

CANDIDATE MEMBER VERTICAL HAND-SELECTED WEIGHTED TO POWER USERS AND CHURN-RISK ACCOUNTS EVERY CANDIDATE ACCOUNT MEMBER CRITERIA THE FOUNDING COHORT THE FOUNDING COHORT FIVE VERTICALS, ONE STANDING PROGRAM ADVISORY PROGRAM A TRUSTED LINE TO POWER USERS TRAVEL FOOD FINTECH RETAIL TECH IN-PERSON KICKOFF MONTHLY SESSIONS QUARTERLY EVENTS NEWSLETTERS A YEAR-LONG CADENCE, PLANNED FROM DAY ONE
Fig. A hand-selected cohort across five verticals, with a year-long cadence from day one
Decision 02 / 04

Expand by score, not enthusiasm

I built a model ranking 15 cities by churn risk, account size, renewal timing, and growth potential, then sequenced the rollout across EMEA, North America, and Asia-Pacific through a nomination process the account teams owned.

LIVE NEXT COMING SOON PARTNER NOMINATION SEQUENCED BY SCORE CHURN RISK, ACCOUNT SIZE, RENEWAL TIMING, GROWTH POTENTIAL EMEA THE FOUNDING REGION NORTH AMERICA SECOND BY SCORE ASIA-PACIFIC THIRD BY SCORE SCORE NOMINATED BY PARTNER TEAMS NOMINATED BY PARTNER TEAMS POSITIONED AS A CUSTOMER COMMUNITY, NOT A SALES PUSH REGION-SPECIFIC PLANS EARNED WARY PARTNER TEAMS OVER
Fig. Expansion sequenced across three regions by score
Decision 03 / 04

Make the program change the product

A community only earns its keep if it changes the product. I wired the cohort into the product process as a standing recruitment pool, and it ran 7 concurrent studies across product areas, each framed as a hypothesis it could disprove.

Member input has to show up in what ships. Otherwise the whole program is just theater.Program-to-product principle
MEMBER INPUT ROADMAP INFLUENCE THE CHANNEL 85.7% JOINED WITHIN 48 HOURS MEMBERS ANSWERING EACH OTHER IN WEEK ONE A STANDING POOL FOR STUDIES, A FAST CHANNEL TO PRESSURE-TEST DIRECTION SYNTHESIZE TRACED TO THE ROADMAP INPUT TO ROADMAP INFLUENCE, NOT A NICE-TO-HAVE DYNAMIC LANDING PAGES AN ATTRIBUTION TOOL BULK CREATION ENHANCEMENTS EVERY INFLUENCE TRACES BACK TO A MEMBER
Fig. Community input traced to roadmap influence, 3 of 8 items since shipped
Decision 04 / 04

Treat at-risk accounts as the proof

The accounts most worth investing in were often weighing competitors mid-contract. A member evaluating a direct competitor fought internally to keep their company on the platform, and the company renewed, citing the program as a big reason.

AT RISK ADVOCATE TOUCHPOINT AT RISK THE ACCOUNTS MOST WORTH INVESTING IN A LARGE ACCOUNT MID-CONTRACT EVALUATING A DIRECT COMPETITOR NO STRONG REASON TO STAY SUSTAINED, GENUINE ENGAGEMENT THE FOUNDING COHORT AS PROOF OF CONCEPT KICKOFF MONTHLY SESSIONS EVENTS A DIRECT LINE THE INTERNAL ADVOCATE FOUGHT TO KEEP THEIR COMPANY ON THE PLATFORM 7 OF 8 FOUNDING ACCOUNTS STILL IN, A YEAR ON THE ONE EXIT FOLLOWED A LAYOFF, NOT A CHOICE TO LEAVE
Fig. An at-risk account turned internal advocate through sustained engagement
Next / Case 01
Rebuilding a platform with every customer still on it